By Agro-Soft Ltd on 18.05.2023
A more systematic analysis of the families’ cohesiveness based on T-Tests for the mean differences between generic attributes within and outside a meme families reaffirmed this tendency. We found significantly more common attributes between meme instances from the same family. In general, each instance shared more attributes with other family members (3.49) than with nonfamily members (2.39), T(18865) = , p < .01. This similarity between instances of the same family is significant in terms of content (T(6534) = , p < .01), participants (T(12755) = , p < .01), and form (T(16379) = 41.2, p < .01).
But really, while looking individually within content, participation, and you can mode functions, there have been many household which have nonsignificant differences when considering brand new mean inner and you may exterior common qualities. This was particularly true into the stuff characteristic. Only 12 off fifty meme families shared even more blogs functions when you look at the family members. Quite simply, posts qualities was less cohesive for the majority meme parents. On the other hand, from inside the family members were stuff is actually discovered to be more cohesive, it was and a lot more unique and distinctive.
Also, extremely meme family members had men as well as teenager and you may young adult players since their preferred has actually. Most other a long time, instance older people, grownups, infants, and children in addition to ladies, famous people, and particularly creature members was indeed a great deal more unique to particular meme household. In the long run, when it comes to function, extremely meme family members utilized straightforward photo having text message otherwise movies. Meme parents where form is actually a great deal more cohesive common remix and you can visual control plus acronyms and you can wordplay.
The cohesiveness of meme families around more unique generic attributes already provided a partial answer to RQ4, regarding the link between cohesiveness and uniqueness in meme families, and a Pearson correlation between the two revealed a very strong and significant positive correlation (r = .911, p < .001). In other words, the more unique the shared attributes within a meme family, the higher the difference between shared attributes within and outside a meme family. When looking at each group of attributes separately, it was mainly the uniqueness of form (r = .870, p < .001) and content (r = .726, p < .001) attributes that positively correlated with family cohesiveness. The uniqueness of participation attributes had a weaker correlation with family cohesiveness (r = .366, p < .01).
In response to the last research question, we found a significant positive correlation between quiddity concreteness and both the cohesiveness (r = .363, p < .01) and uniqueness (r = .431, p < .01) of Internet memes. In other words, a meme family with a more concrete quiddity was also more cohesive and unique in its generic attributes.
In particular, a significant positive correlation was found between the percentage of instances in a meme family sharing a similar object and the cohesiveness (r = .286, p < .05) and uniqueness (r = .349, p < .05) of their content. This suggests that instances of meme families in which the quiddity is a specific object tend also to deal with the same unique themes. Thus, for example, instances of the “Flying Spaghetti Monster” family always included this specific character or object, and many of them also contained references to religion, which is a unique theme in the memetic sphere.
Meme families in which the quiddity is a character, such as “Charlie the Unicorn,” are more cohesive, but also unique in terms of participation. This is typically reflected in a higher percentage of instances containing animal participants. Perhaps less obvious is the negative correlation between action and uniqueness of participation (r = ?.329, p < .05). This means that the participants in meme families in which the main quiddity is an action are not unique, but rather part of the mainstream. Thus, for example, most participants of “Caramelldansen,” “The Evolution of Dance,” or “Planking” are teens or young adults.
Пн | Вт | Ср | Чт | Пт | Сб | Вс |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
« Авг | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Основываясь на европейском 40 летнем опыте внедрения информатизации аграрных предприятий, мы предлагаем концепцию комплексного внедрения технологий точного земледелия. Собирая в единое целое технологии, технику, инновации мы заставляем их работать в единой системе.
Мы находимся в самой гуще сельскохозяйственной жизни, отсюда получаем всю необходимую информацию для оптимизации наших программ, и здесь, в производственной практике находим в конечном итоге наших клиентов.
355003, г. Ставрополь, ул. Краснофлотская, 66
350000, г. Краснодар, ул. Трудовой Славы, 25
352193, Краснодарский край. г. Гулькевичи ул. Крестьянская, 1
agro-soft@afro-soft.ru
Phone 8(865)246-45-61
Fax 8(861)603-25-53
© 2017, Агро-Софт